Political Tensions Rise Over Motorway Funding in Pakistan
In a recent session of Pakistan’s National Assembly, tensions flared between the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and the opposition Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) over the contentious issue of motorway funding. The dispute centers on what PPP representatives allege to be the diversion of funds from the Sukkur–Hyderabad motorway project to the Lahore–Bahawalnagar motorway, a move they claim serves political ends rather than public interests.
PPP lawmaker Syed Naveed Qamar raised what he called an urgent public concern regarding the proposed transfer of a staggering Rs465 billion from the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP). He argues that the government’s reallocation of developmental funds threatens both fiscal equity and political integrity. According to Qamar, this isn’t just a matter of budget allocation but raises broader questions about the federal status of vital infrastructure projects.
In response, Minister of State for Planning Armaghan Subhani firmly denied the claims of fund diversion. He maintained that no inter-scheme allocations were being made, affirming that any discussions regarding the Bahawalpur motorway were baseless and not affecting the original funding intentions for the Sukkur-Hyderabad motorway.
What followed was a heated discussion among lawmakers. PPP’s Sharmila Farooqi highlighted inconsistencies in governmental commitments and emphasized that including provincial projects in the PSDP violates national fiscal agreements. She warned that if Punjab’s projects continue to receive unilateral funding, it could spark a wave of similar demands from other provinces, leading to a troubling financial imbalance across the country.
Farooqi raised red flags, stating that while the project’s costs had surged by a significant 73%, the design remained incomplete. “It’s concerning to see funding being pushed forward without a coherent plan,” she said. This commentary reflects broader anxieties about governance and equitable resource distribution in the country.
On the other side, Subhani attempted to clarify the government’s stance, explaining that only a small section of the project had been approved under PSDP funding. He reassured the assembly that any manageability of additional funds remained the responsibility of the provincial government.
The assembly session, chaired by Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq, saw various lawmakers voice their grievances, including complaints about absent ministers during crucial discussions. The Speaker directed ministers to compile detailed reports on the matter for further examination by the National Assembly Standing Committee on Planning.
As citizens continue to rely on governmental assurances for infrastructure development, it’s essential to keep a close eye on these proceedings. Questions remain about how effectively the government will address regional disparities and honor its commitments.
For those interested in staying updated on these vital national issues, following platforms like Pro21st can offer insights and foster more informed engagement with your community. Understanding these dynamics not only promotes awareness but also strengthens our collective voice in the democratic process.
At Pro21st, we believe in sharing updates that matter.
Stay connected for more real conversations, fresh insights, and 21st-century perspectives.
