Supreme Court Halts ADRC Proceedings: What You Need to Know
Recently, the Supreme Court of Pakistan made headlines by putting a stay on all ongoing proceedings in cases before the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committees (ADRCs). If you’re not familiar with ADRCs, these committees were set up to handle tax-related disputes involving state entities, and they operate under the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).
Why did the Supreme Court step in? A division bench led by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi highlighted that the FBR, in collaboration with the Ministry of Law and Justice, is currently revamping how members are appointed to these committees. The goal is to ensure a more transparent and effective mechanism is in place.
The Court’s Directive
In its two-page directive, the court underscored the importance of consulting various stakeholders, including Shahid Jamil, the attorney for the petitioner ZTBL, and legal experts involved in the process. The court ordered the FBR to consider their opinions before finalizing the new framework for ADRC member appointments. All ADRC proceedings are now on pause until July 24, 2025, allowing time for this review.
Perspectives on the ADRC System
Opinions about the ADRC’s effectiveness are mixed. Some lawyers, particularly those representing state-owned enterprises (SOEs), argue that the current system is "destructive." They claim that SOEs are being overwhelmed by tax demands with little recourse, leading to serious financial strains. One lawyer noted that billions of rupees were forcibly collected in June without the legally mandated notices to meet revenue targets—a move they argue is unjust and threatening to the survival of profit-making SOEs.
Conversely, others defend the FBR, suggesting that it is within its rights to form ADR committees to expedite tax dispute resolutions. Hafiz Ehsaan Ahmad, who has represented the FBR, acknowledged the flaws within the ADR system, such as a lack of qualified arbitrators and limited enforceability of outcomes.
The Future of ADRCs
The stay imposed by the Supreme Court is a crucial moment for the ADRC framework in Pakistan. As the FBR works toward improving its processes, the input from various legal professionals will be invaluable. Transparency in member appointments could potentially address many concerns and restore faith in this system, ensuring that it serves its purpose better.
It is essential for everyone impacted by these changes to stay informed and engaged in discussions. The fate of tax dispute resolutions hangs in the balance, and the upcoming developments will be crucial for both the state entities and the FBR.
If you’re seeking clarity on tax-related issues or want to explore more about the ADRC framework, connecting with industry professionals can provide valuable insights. For further information and expert guidance, consider reaching out to Pro21st, where engaging discussions about these evolving topics take place.
At Pro21st, we believe in sharing updates that matter.
Stay connected for more real conversations, fresh insights, and 21st-century perspectives.
