Key events
Patterson says she told ex-partner before she moved children to a new school
Rogers takes Patterson to Facebook messages she sent to her online friends in a group chat on 7 December 2022.
In the message, Patterson says if Simon will not be involved in paying for school fees she can âchoose their school all by myselfâ.
Rogers asks if Pattersonâs evidence is still that she consulted Simon before she moved her children to a new school.
âI did advise. I did tell him,â Patterson says.
Patterson denies she was âangryâ with her in-laws
Rogers suggests Patterson was âangryâ that her in-laws would not adjudicate the dispute between her and Simon.
Patterson says she was not angry.
Rogers says Patterson did not tell Simon she was planning to move their children to a new school.
Rogers says: âI suggest you just did it without notice to him. Correct or incorrect?â
Patterson rejects this.
Patterson denies attempting to persuade in-laws in group chat messages
Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC is cross-examining Patterson.
Patterson is seated in the witness box, dressed in a dark top with white polka dots.
Rogers takes Patterson to a group chat she had with Simon and his parents, Don and Gail. The messages, shown to the court yesterday, are from December 2022 and on the app Signal.
In the messages, the group are discussing financial arrangements for their children, including their school fees.
Yesterday, Patterson said in the messages she was not trying to get her in-laws to persuade their son, Simon, to pay half of Patterson and Simonâs childrenâs school fees.
Rogers asks Patterson if this is still her answer. Patterson says it is.
She says she was trying to get her in-laws to âmediateâ the issue.
âI was trying to ask Don and Gail to help Simon and I communicate about this better,â Patterson says.
The jurors have entered the courtroom in Morwell.
What the jury heard on Thursday
As we wait for todayâs proceedings to get under way, hereâs a recap of what the jury heard on Thursday â day 27 of the trial.
-
Under cross-examination, Erin Patterson denied deliberately foraging death cap mushrooms, placing them in a beef wellington she served her guests and weighing them to calculate the fatal dose for a person.
-
Patterson denied telling her lunch guest she had been diagnosed with cancer. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC said she told her lunch guests she had cancer. Patterson replied: âI donât agree.â Earlier, she said she thought she talked about âundergoing some testingâ at lunch.
-
Patterson said she lied to police about dehydrating mushrooms and food because she was âafraidâ of being âheld responsibleâ.
-
Patterson was cross-examined on correspondence with her mother-in-law, Gail Patterson, in the lead-up to the lunch about medical appointments that did not occur. During the questioning by Rogers, Patterson acknowledged she lied about appointments, including for a needle biopsy.
-
Justice Christopher Beale told the jury the timeline of the trial â initially scheduled for up to six weeks â had blown out by at least a fortnight.
Good morning
Welcome to day 28 of Erin Pattersonâs triple murder trial.
Patterson, who began testifying on Monday afternoon, will return to the witness box for a fifth day.
Prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC will continue cross-examining Patterson.
The trial, which is in its sixth week, will resume from 10.30am. The court will adjourn early today, at 1pm.
Patterson, 50, faces three charges of murder and one charge of attempted murder relating to a beef wellington lunch she served at her house in Leongatha, in regional Victoria, on 29 July 2023.
She is accused of murdering her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and her estranged husbandâs aunt, Heather Wilkinson. The attempted murder charge relates to Heatherâs husband, Ian.
She has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The prosecution alleges Patterson deliberately poisoned her lunch guests with âmurderous intentâ but her lawyers say the poisoning was a tragic accident.
