Current Landscape of Judicial Appeals in Pakistan: The Case of Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri
In recent weeks, the case of sacked judge Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri has captured quite a bit of attention in Pakistan. Under the law, he has 30 days to challenge the Islamabad High Court (IHC) ruling that removed him from office, but the road ahead appears fraught with challenges.
Since the introduction of the 26th Constitutional Amendment last year, the balance between the judiciary and executive has shifted, making it tougher for individuals seeking justice against state institutions. The establishment of the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) under the 27th Amendment has only added another layer of complexity. The initial appointments to this new apex court are at the discretion of the current government, leading many to believe that a fair hearing for Jahangiri may be unlikely.
Legal experts are divided on the prospects of Jahangiri’s appeal. While some argue that he has a strong legal foundation for his case, the prevailing atmosphere isn’t favorable for swift relief. “It may be wise for him to file the petition but wait for a more opportune time to push forward,” suggests one lawyer.
Pakistan’s judiciary has seen inconsistencies in its rulings over the years, oscillating between being pro-executive and offering relief to citizens. The case of former judge Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui highlights these fluctuations. Where Siddiqui once faced repeated failures in securing relief, the tide turned under the leadership of former Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa.
Moreover, critics highlight a troubling trend: the judiciary seems increasingly influenced by political contexts, which has raised alarms about judicial independence. “This creates a chilling effect on the judiciary,” notes Advocate Azhar Sadiq, who challenges the legal basis for Jahangiri’s removal.
The debate extends further, as Jahangiri has also filed a complaint against IHC Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar. The outcome of this complaint could significantly impact his case and the broader implications for Pakistan’s judiciary.
As the situation continues to develop, those interested in legal reform and judicial independence in Pakistan may find this case more than just a courtroom battle; it could be a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle for justice.
If you want to stay up-to-date on legal matters and judicial reforms in Pakistan, consider connecting with Pro21st for expert insights and resources. Your engagement could make a difference in fostering a more just legal landscape.
At Pro21st, we believe in sharing updates that matter.
Stay connected for more real conversations, fresh insights, and 21st-century perspectives.
