PTI Expels Five MNAs Supporting 26th Amendment, Pursues Disqualification

- Pakistan - July 13, 2025
0 views 4 mins 0 Comments

Understanding the Recent PTI Expulsions: What You Need to Know

In the world of Pakistani politics, loyalty and discipline often go hand in hand, particularly within party lines. A recent incident involving the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has thrown these values into focus. Five members of the National Assembly were formally expelled for defying party directives and voting in favor of the controversial 26th Constitutional Amendment. This move has shifted the political landscape and left many wondering about its implications.

On July 12, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan issued formal notifications expelling Aurangzeb Khan Khichi, Zahoor Elahi, Usman Ali, Mubarak Zeb, and Muhammad Ilyas Chaudhry. These lawmakers, who were elected under PTI banners, had pledged loyalty to the party’s stance. However, during a vote on October 21, they broke ranks, casting their votes in favor of the amendment, which narrowly secured passage with 225 votes—just one more than the needed 224.

The PTI’s official statement highlighted that the decision to oppose the 26th Amendment was made unanimously during a parliamentary meeting on September 2, 2024. Instructions were promptly submitted to the Speaker of the National Assembly for record, leaving little room for interpretation. But even amidst this clear directive, the five MNAs chose to side against the party, effectively committing what PTI described as a “flagrant breach of oath, loyalty, and parliamentary discipline.”

Following their vote, the party took further action by issuing show-cause notices on November 5, questioning the rationale behind their actions and hinting at potential disqualification under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution. Despite forming a hearing committee for the lawmakers to respond to these allegations, none showed up or provided any justification for their votes.

The situation has escalated, with PTI accusing the expellees of crossing over to another parliamentary party by taking seats on the treasury benches. In political terms, this constitutes formal defection, which can bring significant consequences under Pakistani law.

Moreover, the 26th Constitutional Amendment itself is no small matter. It introduces key changes to Pakistan’s judicial landscape, altering processes related to judicial appointments and the tenure of the Chief Justice, making it even more crucial for lawmakers to align closely with their party’s stance.

So, what does this mean for the future of PTI and the expelled members? The leadership is calling for the Election Commission of Pakistan to initiate disqualification processes against the five lawmakers, suggesting the party is serious about upholding its principles. Whether or not this will affect voter sentiments remains to be seen.

All in all, this political drama serves as a potent reminder of the intricate balance between individual political ambition and party loyalty. Regardless of one’s stance on the issues at hand, it’s evident that politics operates in a realm where decisions can have wide-ranging effects.

If you found this breakdown useful and want to stay updated on the latest political developments, consider connecting with Pro21st. We aim to share more insights that matter to you!

At Pro21st, we believe in sharing updates that matter.
Stay connected for more real conversations, fresh insights, and 21st-century perspectives.

TAGS:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Rating